From 2007 through 2011 the Paleochronology group had 11 dinosaur bone samples carbon dated by the Center for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of Georgia, and for good reason.
Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon-14 testing.
These, together with many other remarkable concordances between samples from different fossils, geographic regions and stratigraphic positions make random contamination as origin of the C-14 unlikely". She started a firestorm of controversy in 20 when she reported that she had sequenced proteins in the dinosaur bone.
Critics charged that the findings were mistaken or that what she called soft tissue was really biofilm produced by bacteria that had entered from outside the bone.
As long as the public thinks that "evolution and the millions of years" has been proven, they can go about their business of peer review, i.e. teaching (what are ultimately) doctrines of demons.
He said that his team and the laboratories they employed took special care to avoid contamination.
If Carbon-14 dating works shouldn't it verify the ages of these mummies, organs, wheat, and other items? The radiometric dates usually vary wildly from the known dates.